No cross-section was recorded far enough back to compare against. Both ends of a comparison have to be samples that were actually taken.
5 assets, sampled 18 Sep, 04:16 UTC. Each asset's two scores are its rank against the rest of the tracked universe at that instant — turnover in the 92nd percentile of the top 200 means exactly that, and nothing about what happens next. How this differs from the market chart.
Stablecoins are excluded: high turnover and no narrative is what a stablecoin is, so ranking them by that gap measures a definition rather than a condition. Show them anyway.
| Asset | Rank | Voice | Money | Gap | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CC Canton | 23 | 85 | 21 | −64 | Chatter without conviction |
| M MemeCore | 32 | 93 | 34 | −59 | Chatter without conviction |
| ICP Internet Computer | 47 | 75 | 38 | −37 | Chatter without conviction |
| SHIB Shiba Inu | 30 | 67 | 44 | −23 | Chatter without conviction |
| LINK Chainlink | 13 | 57 | 35 | −22 | Chatter without conviction |
A positive gap is money moving ahead of attention; a negative one is attention ahead of money. Both are readings of a recorded moment. Nothing on this screen is a recommendation.